Rigorous critique is part of the work.

What to contribute

• Proof-positive cases with strong source metadata.
• Proof-negative cases where a Fractalish reading fails.
• HOLD cases where the morphology may matter but the evidence is not yet strong enough.
• Citations, precedent papers, or domain-specific corrections.
• Tooling and evidence-package feedback.

How to contribute

Use the public GitHub hub for documentation or tooling critique and the Commons submission lanes for morphology cases. Every case should preserve source, license, limitations, and the reason it belongs in proof-positive, proof-negative, or HOLD.

Public collaboration lanes

• Add a reference or prior-art lead.
• Submit a morphology example with provenance.
• Suggest a dataset or benchmark lane.
• Report a site or document issue.
• Submit hostile review or descriptor criticism.
• Request tooling or evidence-package improvements.

Contribution guardrails

• Do not force a process reading where the evidence is weak.
• Preserve source and license information.
• Mark drafts as drafts and archives as archives.
• Prefer sequences, timepoints, or outcome linkage where available.
• Proof-negative cases are valuable.

Media rule

If the contribution is a Fractalish-produced video, it should not trap knowledge in linear media. Provide captions, transcript, references, and a companion text page or study-note layer.

What to include

When contributing through the public hub, include source or provenance, domain, why it matters, what claim it supports or challenges, whether it is MCVA, AMCVA, or HOLD, and any known limitations.