Consequence -> retained distinction -> changed future selectivity. Two adversarial rounds have defined enough structure to build the smallest Formation Kernel that can prove the candidate mechanism wrong.
A capable host may already know how to write, calculate, code, simulate, reason, and use tools. The developmental question is different: can experience leave executable consequence that changes what the same capable machine can notice, reject, trust, retrieve, test, recover, or reach next?
CAPABILITY != HOST POLICY != ACQUIRED FORMATION
Nothing here requires accepting Consequential Formation in advance. The architecture must survive matched baselines, causal intervention, ablation, recovery, and independent review.
MFM and the Formative Field remain build-test targets. NLM-BD001 has not defined learning. Distributed embodiment does not establish identity across bodies. CNTM is optional. Energy availability is not intelligence. Multi-model agreement is not evidence.